Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can Individual Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area from accessory for the people mating. Report about Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A beneficial. (2002). Websites contradiction reviewed. Journal regarding Societal Products, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social tech that decreases societal involvement and emotional really-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Amount, time, and duration of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Latest Inhabitants Profile, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study out-of intimacy, passions, and you may connection: https://gorgeousbrides.net/da/blog/juridiske-sporgsmal/ Research brand new presumptions of your triangular concept from like. Psychological Account, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Effect better on undertaking worse: Societal comparisons in this intimate relationship. Journal regarding Identification and you can Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit cognition out of close competition. Record out-of Personality and you will Public Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A. (2001)mitment and you may relationship restoration systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to glamorous selection: The latest evolved psychology of matchmaking repair. Advancement and you can People Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential study from disagreement and you will accord during the troubled and you may nondistressed marital couples. Log away from Contacting and Logical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationships development on the web: What’s the larger attraction? Journal out-of Personal Affairs, 58(1), 9–30.
The many benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization additionally the construction from pleasure when you look at the personal relationships
Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-investigations purposes when you look at the personal relationships: A style of global improvement and particular confirmation. From inside the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents throughout the examination of few communication (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor thread from contact of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Principle, Look, Practice, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New societal overseeing system: Increased awareness in order to public signs as a transformative response to public different. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new societal outcast: Ostracism, public exclusion, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Push.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Internationally and you may certain relational activities regarding the exposure to personal relationships. Diary regarding Identification and you may Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you can recommendations seeking to within the intimate dating. Character and you may Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular attachment representations in the adulthood: Will there be a love?. Journal Out of Social And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. During the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate matchmaking: Maintenance and you can enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection truly effect certainly partners because the a purpose of new resemblance within mutual experience. Personality And you will Personal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience out-of extrinsic perks into preference and you can enjoying. Log off Identity and you will Public Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.
